The latest biography of Leonardo da Vinci has raised "a puzzling anomaly" in a rediscovered painting that is estimated to fetch $100m at auction next month.
The Salvator Mundi (Saviour of the World) portrays Jesus gesturing in blessing with his right hand while holding a crystal orb in his left hand. Declared authentic only six years ago, it's to be marketed on 15 November by Christie's New York, which explains it as "among fewer than 20 famous paintings by Leonardo, and also the only one in private hands". But in a forthcoming research, Leonardo da Vinci: the Biography, Walter Isaacson questions why an artistic genius, scientist, inventor, and scientist revealed an "unusual lapse or unwillingness" to connect art and science in depicting the orb. He writes: "In 1 respect, it's rendered with amazing scientific precision ... However, Leonardo neglected to paint the distortion which would occur when searching through a solid clear orb at things that aren't touching the orb. "Strong crystal or glass, whether shaped like an orb or a lens, generates magnified, inverted, and reversed images. Instead, Leonardo painted the orb as though it were a hollow glass bubble that does not refract or distort the light passing through it." He argues that when Leonardo had accurately depicted the distortions, the hands touching the orb could have stayed the way but peeking inside the orb are a diminished and inverted mirror image of the robes of Christ and arm. It is all the more vexing, he notes, as Leonardo was in the time "deep into his optics research, and the way light reflects and refracts an obsession." He filled his notebooks with diagrams of light bouncing around at several angles, he says, wondering whether Leonardo "chose not to paint it this way, simply because he believed it'd be a diversion ... or since he had been subtly attempting to impart a miraculous quality to Christ and his orb". Some of the world's foremost specialists supported the Leonardo attribution in 2011 when Luke Syson contained the painting into his Leonardo exhibition. But major scholars have doubts. Frank Zöllner, of the University of Leipzig, wrote in an art journal in 2013 that the painting could be a "high-quality merchandise of Leonardo's workshop" or even a later follower. Isaacson is very interested in a study from Michael Daley, the director of ArtWatch UK, who said this week: "There is not enough to claim it's a Leonardo. His figural advancement was towards higher naturalism and complexity of posture -- heads turning such a manner, shoulders turning another way, with spins and movement. "The Salvator Mundi is dead-pan look, like an icon, with no real depth in the modeling. Another unexplained peculiarity is that the figure itself is heavily and uncharacteristically cropped." Daley also pointed out that the optical deflections appear within an engraving by Wenceslaus Hollar, the 17th-century etcher, from Leonardo's first article, dismissing the suggestion that "Leonardo knew all about the optics, but just decided not to bother." Isaacson stated: "If you balance the evidence for and against ... then that's a valid purpose, which Hollar wouldn't have distorted the robes if they had not been at the first painting ... If you have a look at the Hollar engraving and, even if it's much different, that counts against [this painting] being original." He spoke to science specialists in studying optics. Asked whether he would put money into the painting if he had $100m, '' Isaacson explained: "The preponderance of the experts is that it's authentic, and so I would -- but that does not mean that I would be sure." A Christie's spokeswoman said: "Leonardo's paintings have been known for their mystery and ambiguity. He was familiar with the technicality and attributes of light and astronomy. If the picture had been recreated by him with optical exactitude, the background could have been twisted. "It's our opinion that he chose not to portray it in this way as it would be too distracting to the subject of the painting." Read more: Researchers Question Why a Colossal Hole Keeps Opening Up in Antarctica Owning a Car Will Someday Be a Matter of the Past Fossilized Teeth That’s Near 9.7 Million Years Old Could Change Human History South Florida instructor is out a job after throwing a surprise birthday party in a classroom which showcased sex toys and party favors that are X-rated, according to a report.
Parents told WSVN-TV that the party in the Mater Lakes Academy charter school in Miami Wednesday vulnerable the students -- who were as young as 11 -- to sex-themed party favors. The mother of a young woman who was an attendee said the celebration was to get a former male pupil, and when he walked into the classroom "they surprised him with a hat that had a penis attached to the top along with a string to have the ability to pull it ... ," the station reported. She also said the celebration included a cake that was in the shape of the form, according to the station. Snippets of movie shot aired at the celebration revealing the hat along with items that were sexual. Students who were reported to function as members of the dance team of the school can be heard singing happy birthday. "You can't even imagine," said the mom, who is also a teacher, WSVN said. "You know, I have raised my daughter the proper manner and never taught her anything like that." The girl told the station her daughter was upset. "She could not sleep last night. She woke up crying," she said. "It hurts that she's being taught this in the college where I hope she is gonna be taken care of." The instructor wasn't identified. Mater Lakes Academy officials said the dance instructor had been fired, but would not say who brought in the X-rated party favors, the station said. They said in a statement, "Once we became aware of the situation, we addressed it instantly and have taken the proper measures and the individual has been dismissed," the station reported. Read more: Guide to Prevent Your Jack-O’-Lantern From Rotting Senate Republicans Block Measure To Keep Arctic Wildlife Sanctuary From Oil Drilling You Should Do a Crawl Test In Your House Before The Baby Comes Dental remains discovered by German paleontologists that were sifting through gravel and sand in a former bed of the Rhine River could possibly result in a "rewriting" of human history.
The fossilized remains of what are believed to be good ape teeth, an upper first molar and a upper puppy that is left, were found a bit over one year ago near the town of Eppelsheim in southwestern Germany. "It's perfectly preserved. It really looks like a new tooth. It's shining like amber," Herbert Lutz, head of the excavation team and deputy museum manager in the Mainz Natural History Museum, told USA Today. Lutz reported that the discovery is groundbreaking for its potential to change our understanding of how people migrated and developed in prehistoric times. "I don't want to over-dramatize it, but I would hypothesize that we shall have to start studying the history of mankind later today," Mainz Mayor Michael Ebling told reporters during a press conference this week announcing the discovery, '' reports the Times of Israel. According to researchers, our current understanding is that hominins, our extinct individual ancestors, left Africa about 120,000 years back. The discovered remains are older. "We've similar finds just in East Africa...however they are only 2, 3, 4 or 5 million years old, and Eppelsheim is almost 10," said Matz. "So the question is: What's happened? Where this ape came from we do not know. We do not have similar finds from southern Europe." Even though the scientist made the discovery in September 2016, they were so perplexed by what they had discovered they waited until this month to release a report about it. As of this moment, it's not known in which the teeth fit in the family tree of humankind. But, Lutz and his team of researchers are just beginning to analyze their unique find. "It's a complete mystery where this person came out, and why nobody has ever found a tooth like this somewhere before," Lutz said in an interview with ResearchGate, in which the report was printed. Read more: Sexual Classroom Surprise Party Gets Florida Teacher Fired Guide to Prevent Your Jack-O’-Lantern From Rotting Senate Republicans Block Measure To Keep Arctic Wildlife Sanctuary From Oil Drilling "The Progressive Income Tax" is one of those economic terms that gets bandied about, but few actually know what it means or how it works. This tale of three similar brothers with three different incomes (but one shared expense) helps explain the tax system under which we live.
New parents are often told they should proof their homes, but when they begin to consider it, they'll do this while standing upright, five or six feet off the floor. The most important step is doing the Crawl Test.
That means getting on all fours and faking to be a curious baby on an infant expedition. You have got to open drawers, look for hairballs and see what tiny crevices you can put your fingers into. You will have the ability to spot any possible hazards from the perspective of your baby before your bundle begins moving and fix them. Here are some items to consider:
After the Crawl Test, you'll see your home and it may motivate you to wipe down those baseboards for the very first time. Probably not, however. You have a baby. Read more: George W. Bush Tackles Trumpism in His Speech How to Flatten Your Belly the Right Way! Apple's New Chicago Store Doesn’t Emphasize on Selling In an age where you're fighting against somebody who believes a Nazi rally has two different sides, allies are found in unlikely locations. Although George W. Bush is very much a precedent for Donald Trump -- his job getting us into two gratuitous wars based on purposeful misinformation (or, as we call them, "lies") and his supporters' silencing of critics who spoke against his government has a direct line to Donald Trump. However, George. W. Bush was also someone who days following September 11th denounced Islamophobia and recruited a diverse array of the gift into key positions in his administration.
Many of his fans are now fans of Donald Trump, so it means something when George W. Bush gave a speech denouncing Trumpism, the white supremacy he promoted, as well as the corruption he spreads. Here Bush comes out against Donald Trump. In the speech, Bush said, as a clear attack on Trump -- "Bigotry seems emboldened. Our politics seems more vulnerable to conspiracy theories and outright fabrication." What impact George W. Bush's speech will probably have is yet to be seen. At the meanwhile, people don't expect to find articulation trusting the words may make a difference to those who hear the tricky line neocon, and coming from someone for it Republican base. Read more: How to Flatten Your Belly the Right Way! Apple's New Chicago Store Doesn’t Emphasize on Selling Border Locals Are Not Impressed With Trump’s Walls Every Senate Republican voted to block an amendment that would have protected a swath of the Alaskan Arctic flouting attempts from Democrats and environmental groups to maintain the region under government protection.
"That is a frontal attack in an ideological struggle. The Arctic is your holy grail." "That is a clear attempt to use the budget reconciliation process to pass a divisive and controversial proposal that will lead us in the wrong direction on climate." "The notion that we, tonight, following 60-plus decades, could give up what's a biologically important area, a critical habitat for polar bears, a breeding ground for caribou, migratory birds and over 200 species -- for what? For petroleum we do not need?" Cantwell said on the Senate floor Thursday, according into The Hill. "Those who'd support this amendment will deny us the chance to do something constructive in this country, in regards to our chances to produce energy, to produce riches," Murkowski said. Components of the ANWR that could be opened for drilling are considered to hold 10.3 billion barrels of oil, according to the U.S. Geological Survey. Republican Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, have pushed to permit the Senate's Energy and Natural Resources Committee (which Murkowski seats) to pass laws to increase $1 billion within the next ten years. Environmental groups say government earnings from drilling permits in some of the refuge is a probable source to increase such money even though a provision including the ANWR -- as the Arctic book is famous -- is not explicit. The bill was voted down, 52 to 48. Democrat Joe Manchin was the only member of his party to vote against it, and Sen. Susan Collins (Maine) was the lone Republican in service. A bill to open up drilling in the ANWR would demand a vote because it's in the budget program, rather than the 60 votes needed making the prospects of a decision much easier. Democrats, headed by Sen. Maria Cantwell, were trying to add an addendum to the room's budget plan which would bar drilling at the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, that covers over 19 million acres in northeastern Alaska. The region, explained by the state's tourism agency as one of Alaska's crown jewels, is home to polar bears, caribou, moose and countless species of migratory birds. The Washington Post reported in Sept. that the Trump administration was searching at the ANWR as a supply of petroleum revenue. An internal memo set out strategies to lift restrictions on seismic studies in the sanctuary, which was closed to such petroleum mining for decades. "Already contending with climate change, now's vote casts their potential into even greater doubt. A caribou herd, in addition to hundreds of bird species, muskoxen and wolves stand to lose from drilling in the refuge. "Republicans are trying to use the funding process to ram through drilling in the crown jewel of America's wildlife refuge system since they know they do not have the votes to do this through regular order," Sen. Ed Markey (D-Mass.) Said in a statement. "Republicans are moving forward with a budget which includes this poison pill to deliver the wildest place left in America to Big Oil. This is nothing more than fossil fuel folly." Read more: You Should Do a Crawl Test In Your House Before The Baby Comes George W. Bush Tackles Trumpism in His Speech How to Flatten Your Belly the Right Way! |
AuthorAnd I believe that good journalism, good television, can make our world a better place. Archives
February 2019
|